“I’m
coughing my head off. My head is plugged. I have a fever. I’m on vacation, and
I need something.”
I’ve
seen over 4,000 guests with respiratory infections. To the average hotel
doctor, this is an easy visit. He arrives, performs the traditional exam,
prescribes the traditional antibiotic, and accepts his fee and the guest’s
thanks. What’s not to like?
That
the antibiotic is unnecessary doesn’t bother the doctor, but it would bother me.
Despite my colleagues’ insistence that patients demand an antibiotic, most of mine
don’t. A small minority appear disappointed when I don’t prescribe one, and a
tiny number make it painfully clear that I’ve missed the boat.
For
decades, solemn editorials in medical journals have urged us to stop
prescribing useless antibiotics, warning that they’re poisoning the
environment, producing nasty, drug-resistant germs that are already killing
thousands.
Despite
this, giving antibiotics for viral respiratory infections remains almost
universal. Almost every doctor whose prescribing habits I know – admittedly a
limited sample – does it. None believe they help. All tell me that patients
expect them.
“I
don’t want an antibiotic if I don’t need it,” patients often tell me. “But how
do I know?”
“You
don’t, but bacterial respiratory infections are rare in healthy people.”
“What
if it’s bronchitis? I get that a lot.”
“Antibiotics
don’t help bronchitis.”
“That’s
what my doctor gives me. Are implying he’s incompetent?”
“No.
Prescribing unnecessary antibiotics is so common that one could call it the
standard of practice – meaning competent doctors do it.”
You have done a great job. I will definitely dig it and personally recommend to my friends. I am confident they will be benefited from this site.
ReplyDeletebest doctor